At present it seems that there are not really any changes to the laws though there are several envisaged.
It has become usual that there are changes after each world cup with a moratorium on changes for the rest of the four-year period. (The moratorium, it seems, is a pious myth as numerous ‘clarifications/rulings’ happen instead which have the force of laws and rugby continues to muddle along.
Countries can now put their names down to test out proposed changes. Such testing is known in Australia, England, France, Wales and in four of World Rugby’s competitions – Nations Cup, Pacific Nations Cup, Tbilisi Cup and Under-20 Trophy.
The World Rugby competitions will try out all the possible changes. They will be selectively trues in Australia’s National Rugby Championship, the Army Premiership in England, France’s Academy League, New Zealand’s National Provincial Championship and in Wales the Premiership and the Colleges Championship.
Clearly other countries will join in as they deem fit.
We shall go through the proposed changes as they appear in the law book. The big ones are the referees, the tackle, maul and the scrum. Mind you all law changes are important. After all it is the laws that give the game its inner distinctive beauty – make it different from tiddlywinks. Change the laws and you change the game.
And what about a five-metre drop out?
As the experiments go along, those playing guinea pig will report and reports will be examined by three World Rugby working committees (Law Review Group, the Scrum Steering Group and the Multi-Disciplinary Injury Prevention Group), then by the Rugby Committee and then by the executive of World Rugby. Law changes my be approved as late as November 2018.
Continue reading Law changes: Possibilities →